Lack of Timely Notice – A Powerful and Often Neglected Defense in Recorded Statements

Written by Andrew Willis, Esq. Edited by Rachel Riordan, Esq. Whether a claimant suffered an “injury by accident” that arises out of and occurs in the course of employment usually takes an undue amount of time during a recorded statement.  The factual variations are endless and the black letter law is often blurred, making it hard to know where to focus your questioning. Luckily, lack of timely notice is relatively straightforward and this defense is often neglected during recorded statements.  In general, an injured worker needs to notify a supervisor of a work accident within 30 days.  If an injured worker fails to give legally sufficient notice, that worker’s claim can be completely barred – even if they sustained a compensable “injury by accident.”  In other words, lack of timely is a very powerful defense.  It can give you a clear, reliable reason to deny an otherwise compensable claim.  What follows are crucial questions to ask about notice during a recorded statement, along with a brief explanation of the law on notice. 1.  Who Did You Tell? The Workers’ Compensation Act requires notice to the “employer” pursuant to §65.2-600.  Of course, this means some specific person.  The cases discuss the need to tell a “foreman,” “superior officer,” or “supervisor.”  In other words, telling a co-worker isn’t enough.  Get the claimant to identify who the claimant considered to be the “boss” and find out whether the claimant told that person.  Also, because there may be more than one supervisor, have the claimant list all supervisors, any other people the claimant believed should be informed of work accidents, as well as...